10/31/2023 0 Comments Asce 41 17 pdf downloadStructures were then subjected to more than 300 real strong ground motion (GM) records employing nonlinear dynamic analysis and fragility curves were obtained. At first, building capacity curves and damage limits, defined by the different code methods, were determined via pushover analyses. Eight different occupied buildings, classified according to construction dates (old and new) and story numbers (3 to 6), were selected and investigated by using these codes. Building performances were determined according to TEC-2007, TBEC-2018, EC8/3 and ASCE 41-17. Therefore, in this study assessment methods recommended by different seismic codes were investigated and probabilistically assessed by comparing the fragility curves of existing low- to mid-rise RC structures. Increasing life and economic losses after strong earthquakes shows the necessity of seismic performance assessment studies and methods. Seismic performance of existing buildings constructed before modern seismic design codes is one of the important problems of earthquake prone countries.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |